In a landmark decision, South Africa's Constitutional Court upheld the Gauteng High Court ruling, in the case of “VJV AND ANOTHER v MINISTER OF SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT AND ANOTHER [2023] ZACC 21”, that Section 40 of the Children's Act is unjustifiably discriminatory based on marital status and sexual orientation. This decision stems from a court bid initiated by a lesbian couple, highlighting the Act's inequity in granting parental responsibilities and rights to children conceived through in vitro fertilization (IVF). The judicial challenge drew attention to the Act's exclusion of "permanent life partner" in favor of "spouse" and "husband," which disadvantaged unmarried couples.

The couple's court bid argued that the Children's Act did not give equal parenting obligations and rights for their child born through IVF. Under the existing Act, permanent life partners do not receive the same automatic rights and responsibilities for children conceived via artificial fertilisation as it does to spouses and husbands. The High Court ruled that the addition is to be made, of the term “permanent life partner” following the words “spouse” and “husband” in every occurrence within section 40 of the Children’s Act.

Due to the Act's omission of the words "permanent life partner", there is a discrepancy between married and unmarried couples. While married couples have automatic parental rights, unmarried couples have to approach to the Children's Court to acquire the same rights, even if both partners were equally involved in the child's conception and upbringing.

The Centre for Child Law, situated at the University of Pretoria, joined the case as a friend of the court to assist the couple's legal action. The Centre raised concerns that the existing interpretation of the Act essentially denies children conceived through IVF to unmarried parents’ equal legal recognition and protection. They emphasised the significance of a clear determination of parenthood, as it has a considerable impact on a child's custody, maintenance, and guardianship rights.

In a landmark decision, the Constitutional Court revised the Children's Act to include the terms "permanent life partner" alongside "spouse" and "husband." This change will take effect retroactively on July 1, 2007, providing relief to all impacted parties since that date. However, its execution is halted for 24 months to allow Parliament to correct the constitutional flaw.

In conclusion, South Africa's Constitutional Court's recent judgement on parental rights represents a huge triumph for justice and equality. By addressing the discriminatory provisions of the Children's Act, the court has made significant progress toward guaranteeing that children born through IVF to unmarried parents have the same legal recognition and protection as children born to married couples. This decision represents a commitment to creating a more inclusive and equitable society in which all children's and parents' rights are respected and secured. This forward-thinking action assures that all children, regardless of their parents' marital status, receive equal legal recognition and protection.

#ConstitutionalCourt #parentalrights #IVF #ChildrensAct #CentreforChildLaw  #winning #tag

#thomsonwilksattorneys #thomsonwilksinc

‍